[SantuXD]

I know you are probably confused by the title, so I'll explain what this is about:

We all have moments in our lives when suddenly, a wild sequel appeared! for any game franchise, and even if the game received praise from all sides, there's always someone who can't get into the recent games, and always says "Nah, this isn't that good, I wish they made it like the original/classic/first one/BEST GAEM EVAH". And sometimes you go either "This person has a good point" or "... Really?". This kind of people existed ever since people actually CARED about franchises (I know, shocking), and because there won't be an end to this idea, it got me thinking:

Well, if people won't stop referring the classics, how would things be if there was nothing BUT classics?

And thus, this idea was born: The "Modern Warfare" game, where we think of a world where Game #1 was replicated like it is with some pallet/skin/graphic changes, and gameplay remains like it is, just because people loved it. "Modern Warfare" because is a reference of how CoD is known as "The same thing released every year", and that's the idea of this topic.

"But, wouldn't that mean they would become what MW is?" Depends, MW is a FPS, a genre that was overused for years, but I'm talking about First games that were fresh and unique, like Mario, Sonic, Zelda, ect., that made people enjoy them.

That's the idea, thinking of a world where games are just like the first game (Similar plots, equal gameplay), and seeing if that's really a good idea. Think about it, and reply with your thoughts!

And in this case, we have Megaman . Is the world of X too dark and angsty for your Mega taste? Are sagas like Zero and Legends too over complicated? Are Battle Network and Starforce unnecessary? Was Megaman 9 a light at the end of the tunnel? Think of a world were every Megaman game is Mega Man 1.

(I may include other franchises, but for now let's stick with Megaman, mmkay?)

[Hellfangwolf]

I honestly don't think I'd be able to play games in a world where everything was based off one classic, cause I would get really sick of gaming.

[Alia]

I'm heavily attached to the X series, but I think Zero series were a bit unnecessary.

Just my thoughts.

And for all the games based in one single classic... Not a good idea. However, all platformers were Mario, all FPS were Doom at some extent... Just add a different story and bang! New game.

[Vérité]

Call of Duty isn't necessarily repetitive, there's plenty of changes in each release. Black Ops 2 looks like it will be a leap over the last 5 years, just like World at War and COD4 set a new margin for Shooters back in 2006/2007. People who are sick of hearing about COD call it the same game every year. They're also saying it with Assassin's Creed now, Which makes them very ignorant

[Hellfangwolf]

They aren't the same on certain points of gameplay, but the story for COD tends to follow same thing. Also I don't see how people can call AC something like COD. The story even though I hate to admit it has truely captivated me on a level of the KH games, seeing as the first didn't really grab me, but after AC2 I was set AC:B and R were instant buys for me although some of it wasn't that great and I beat games at an alarming rate and couldn't really play the Multi-player, some of the things did seem lack luster as far as the Ottoman's final tier of guard are absurdly hard and take away the very mechnic the game makes players rely on being counter, but otherwise the story is amazing. I'm just hoping that it doesn't go on for an absurd amount of time.