[Zednanreh]

lessthanthree, on 03 December 2011 - 11:32 PM, said:

Laziness

I knew it!


..... *cough cough*

Quote

just ask.

Let me guess. ShinjiHikari got banned, same as Ogiga?

[Irgy]

Yes, yes they did.

For Ogiga there was still uncertainty about the whole multicounting thing. I still don't know either, but he started spamming Chit Chat and the Chat itself with stupid shit, thus pissing everyone off, so we had enough of him

Shi just went over the deep end during some argument on the Chat. Since the others wanted him off there permanently (Max Chat ban is 2 weeks) and he pretty much never used the forum, we just banned his account entirely. Any possible reconsideration is gone after he went and tried to evade the ban with two alt accounts.

[volt-kid]

^^
That explains my concerns.

[Vérité]

Overdue but never late enough, Shi is on the list now.

[『ちびまる子ちゃん』正人]

Thank fuck. SH was dum.

[Terminus]

Colonel, the new ban.

[Irgy]

He's actually Ogiga.

I'll spare everyone my rant from earlier. It really pissed me off though.

[Vile]

What did he even do? I didn't see him do much but talk in the forum games and ask about some codes for the X titles. And not lame codes, like, one hit KO, more like, 'that could be fun to play with' codes.

[volt-kid]

Irgy, on 28 March 2012 - 11:32 AM, said:

He's actually Ogiga.

I'll spare everyone my rant from earlier. It really pissed me off though.

It's alright.

[Craven]

Vile, on 28 March 2012 - 04:13 PM, said:

What did he even do? I didn't see him do much but talk in the forum games and ask about some codes for the X titles. And not lame codes, like, one hit KO, more like, 'that could be fun to play with' codes.

I have the same question of Vile. Yeah, he had a troll-like attitude sometimes, but for banning? Sometimes I saw how random posts of him were rated negative just because :/.

==Edit==

Oh, I understand, he WAS banned even before he was "Colonel"...well, if that is the case...

This post has been edited by Craven: 28 March 2012 - 07:12 PM

[Irgy]

During his time on here under previous accounts, he was far more spammy and often attempted to "troll" people with it or on the Chat.

While he has to some extent reformed, I'm not sparing him just because of that. He defied his punishment, and for that I will offer no reward. Whether he's become a better person or not is not of the site's concern. Some times people have to take full responsibility for their actions and move on. I'd normally be more persuaded for second chances in other circumstances, but this is the third time now. I'm sick of it.

[Craven]

Irgy, on 28 March 2012 - 07:13 PM, said:

During his time on here under previous accounts, he was far more spammy and often attempted to "troll" people with it or on the Chat.

While he has to some extent reformed, I'm not sparing him just because of that. He defied his punishment, and for that I will offer no reward. Whether he's become a better person or not is not of the site's concern. Some times people have to take full responsibility for their actions and move on. I'd normally be more persuaded for second chances in other circumstances, but this is the third time now. I'm sick of it.

I understand, thanks for the answers.

[Vaankar]

Man this wall of shame looks so gorgeous, what can I do to join them?

[RaviorStygian]

Is it really right to publicly humiliate past members that were banned? I think it's sinful and in bad taste tbh. :\

[Jabon]

RaviorStygian, on 02 July 2012 - 03:13 AM, said:

Is it really right to publicly humiliate past members that were banned? I think it's sinful and in bad taste tbh. :\

Well, it's not like they didn't have it coming or anything.

[DEJO]

RaviorStygian, on 02 July 2012 - 03:13 AM, said:

Is it really right to publicly humiliate past members that were banned? I think it's sinful and in bad taste tbh. :\

well we are a nice community here and we really try our best to stick together... The whole Wall of Shame is good thing because its shows and warns what kind of people try to mess everything up. If you see the reasons why they were banned and think about it, your name you really are a bad person(in the site) and came to troll for the lulz. When they want to be insulting and make a ruckus, you desreve to be seen by others of your bad actions. of course his just what I think...




(p.s. if you good person, you'll be liked and you wont have any problems at all..)

[TheDoctor]

Besides, there are some people who don't bother reading forum rules, but a topic like this might intrigue them. This way, they'll know what not to do if they don't want to get banned.

[Phi-Zero]

RaviorStygian, on 02 July 2012 - 03:13 AM, said:

Is it really right to publicly humiliate past members that were banned? I think it's sinful and in bad taste tbh. :\

Yeah, the Wall of Shame is a bit of a guilty pleasure.

At the very least, it lets people question why members got banned and hopefully get some answers.
It also serves as a warning to those who would cause problems for others, but let's face it: trolls will be trolls.

[Irgy]

RaviorStygian, on 02 July 2012 - 03:13 AM, said:

Is it really right to publicly humiliate past members that were banned? I think it's in bad taste tbh. :\

Admittedly this is way I've sorta felt for a while now.

But, if the majority so wishes to keep it up, then I shall comply *shrug*

[Trip Dering]

That's Irgy for ya. All the power in the world and if a majority wants something other than what he wants, he caves.